Ford Escort XR3i v RS 1600i October 3, 2009
Posted by richard in : Uncategorized , trackbackI really fancy an Escort XR3i MkIII. You know, the one with the upside down rev counter.
But why, reckon Fast Ford hardcorists, when I could also have an RS 1600i?
History lesson time. The original Ford Escort XR3 was much maligned, despite my dad owning one. Intolerable ride, edgy handling and just 96bhp from its 1.6-litre CVH carb. Ford knew something had to be done, so set the British Dunton experts onto a hasty rejig.
While also, bizarrely, sending more funds to Germany, to develop a homologation-special Escort for Group A competition regulations. Thus, 5000 Escort RS 1600is came to be built.
I’ll detail in the future just what gave the Escort XR3 its ‘i’. But the diverging path chosen by the Germans is no less fascinating.
Injection for the CVH was similar to the forthcoming 3i but beneath this, the RS 1600i had a hot cam plus solid valve lifters. These, along with a higher compression ratio, allowed more manic revs. It also had electronic ignition; you can spot this engine from its finned cam cover.
There were big changes in the suspension, too. The XR3i was to have an anti-roll bar to locate the front struts, for example. The RS 1600i had, instead, trailing links, located at the front by an aluminium crossmember.
Why? Well, this was easily changeable – ideal for racing. It also restricted wheel movement, compared to an anti-roll bar; just what’s needed when using racing rubber.
Elsewhere, Koni dampers replaced the XR3i’s Girlings. These were adjustable, and mated to lowered springs that slammed the Escort by 2 inches. The front wheels also retained 1.5deg of positive camber; the better, ‘upright’ stance of the XR3i was not possible.
Tyres themselves were 195/50 15”s, as opposed to the XR3i’s 185/60 15”s. Car Magazine said all this together had several results. Compared to the XR3i, the RS 1600i:
• Had a stiffer ride
• More nervous handling
• Flatter cornering
• Heavy steering
• Intrusive tyre noise
Sounds to me like the better car is already clear: I’d even trade the RS 1600i’s RS-style steering wheel and seats for the (back then) cheaper XR3i.
No worries there. Limited production means it’s an even rarer sight today, with prices changing accordingly. As for me, well, I think it’s about time I got my 3i eye out.
Advice from Ford’s Walter Hayes
Comments»
I saw an XR3i a couple of years ago, absolutely mint and obviously well looked-after.
I was absolutely floored by how good it looked. Given how common Escorts were I was struck by how good the overall design looked, and the extra bells and whistles really rounded it off.
Then again, I’m a big mark for 80s cars, so I suppose I would say that.
Absolutely agree, Robin. 3i extras make ‘em, for sure. Funny: never considered it a potential classic. Now, though, I REALLY want one…
Mind you, I’m joining you in the ’80s love-in, too. Think it’s time I got another Golf GTi MkII!
[...] Ford Escort XR3i v RS 1600i [...]
[...] Ford Escort XR3i v RS 1600i [...]
[...] revealed, was a blast from the past. It’s a mainstream maker’s homologation special. Like the Ford Escort RS 1600i, like the Alfa Romeo 155 Silverstone, like the Mercedes 190 Evolution. And thus, for me, [...]